We can debate until the cows come home about Gnome's strict design policies and simplistic (sometimes to the point of limitation) user interface philosophy, but KDE falls into the opposite issue. Many KDE programs, especially plasma, feel like a "jack of all trades, but a master of none". To put it simply, my main criticisms of KDE are:ġ. I also want to preface this by saying that I have nothing but respect for KDE developers and the other people who contribute to KDE projects, and I don't want my criticism to be taken as a lack of appreciation for what they've made or how they've made it. I wouldn't classify myself as someone who dislikes KDE but I prefer the general design, polish, and philosophy of the Gnome desktop and suite of apps. Amazing things but basic functionality sometimes is broken. But yes we have blur, Media Control on tray etc. But I am little disappointed that simple and essential things don't work right. KDE is great and i like it a lot, there amazing features here. after 3 minutes magically my phone appears on dolphin. For example I plug my phone and KDE can't find it there was error Message. KDE PIM is totally broken, I know KDE Devs tells all the time that it isn't part of KDE but KDE hasn't a reliable Kontakt, email ,etc solution.So KDE PIM has to be a part of KDE and has to be working right out of the box.īugs, right now is much better but is still buggier than gnome.
Kde has maybe 8-10 top apps and except these the quality of rest apps is below the bar.ĭolphin is slow compared to nautilus for example thumbnails generation Kde apps, there are great like dolphin, Okular, Kate, gwenview but the there are a lot of other KDE apps that are totally unstable. I have to Google it 3 or 4 times to find where the things that I would like to change are and keep in mind that I am not a new user I have used KDE 4 for many years and I knew my way around.Ĭonsistency every app looks different, we have hamburger Menu, Normal menu, toolbars etc.įour Kickoff menus or three taskmanagers out of the box I think that maybe is a little bit overkill. KDE is cluttered there are so many settings everywhere. What are the top two things that come to your mind that you find annoyingly too-much about KDE and how does the desktop of your choice do that better? What does the overwhelmingness consist in? Is it primarily visual, that there are too many things present at a time in a view? Is the amount of available features user-unfriendly? The options for configuration?ĭoes this lead to genuine usability problems, such as corrupt configuration states or being unable to find important settings and features, or is it more that you just don't feel comfortable with the overall vibe of it? Which parts of KDE are too cluttered? The desktop environment with the default panels and widgets? The features exposed in native applications like Dolphin file manager? System, widget and application settings? The overall UI style such as spacing between elements? This could hopefully serve as some starting points for KDE contributors on how these issues could be improved. I would like to genuinely understand in more detail from the perspective of users who experience it this way in which way KDE Plasma and KDE applications are "too much" and could benefit from more simplicity.
#MONEY MANAGER EX FONT SIZE WINDOWS 10 SOFTWARE#
The most frequent reason I see for disliking KDE software is that users perceive it as cluttered and overwhelming, and prefer other desktop environments for their simplicity.
0 kommentar(er)
